It is not unusual to see middle-aged and older people who are orders to clerks with a strong tone. There is also a question in the newspaper's writing column as "Why mature middle-ranked men behave greatly for shop clerks" or "Was it also an education that would be unreasonable contact with store clerks?" For many people engaged in the hospitality industry, middle-aged and elderly people are said to be cautious people. On the other hand, there was an opinion that there is also a poor aspect of "a negative chain" against the middle-aged and elderly who chew.
But were those people brought up while being flipped out to business partners and bosses in society? I feel like I can not escape from the spellings because I am self-confident that has grown by "negative chain". Certainly, from the generation that survived the era when the wording or behavior was worse than it is now, there seems to be a sense that "this is a matter of course". Cut off "negative chain"! If the middle-aged and older age who flip out is due to a "negative chain", is a store clerk at a convenience store or a supermarket "a middle-aged child of the future"? There is never such a thing. Many people seem to be teaching to middle-aged people who flip out in a good way, meaning "I do not want to become a human who does unsightly behavior". Chaining is not only negative. As a matter of course, we will also chain positive behaviors. Also, the behavior of the upper generation does not necessarily link to the lower generation. Honoring with anyone, respectfully ... If many people can practice such an ordinary matter, will not it be easier for the world to spend a little more?
